<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: • 2008: THAT JUST HAPPENED</title>
	<atom:link href="http://withapassion.com/2009/01/07/2008-eoy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://withapassion.com/2009/01/07/2008-eoy/</link>
	<description>, a Henry Casey project.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 May 2011 04:41:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Henry</title>
		<link>http://withapassion.com/2009/01/07/2008-eoy/#comment-752</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Henry]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 16:30:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://withapassion.com/?p=875#comment-752</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the correx Tavit, I&#039;m stuck again in n+, on the level where it&#039;s kind of a spiral where you&#039;re going from the outside in, and start off near 18 gold pieces with mines placed between and around them. That&#039;s one hard effing level, man.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the correx Tavit, I&#8217;m stuck again in n+, on the level where it&#8217;s kind of a spiral where you&#8217;re going from the outside in, and start off near 18 gold pieces with mines placed between and around them. That&#8217;s one hard effing level, man.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tavit</title>
		<link>http://withapassion.com/2009/01/07/2008-eoy/#comment-751</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tavit]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 16:27:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://withapassion.com/?p=875#comment-751</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I correct because I love (you)...
&quot;Synecdoche, New York is for all intensive purposes,&quot;

it&#039;s actually, &quot;all intents and purposes&quot;

&quot;The correct phrase is &quot;to all intents and purposes.&quot; This phrase dates back to the 1500s and originated in English law, where it was &quot;to all intents, constructions, and purposes.&quot; In modern usage, &quot;for all intents and purposes&quot; is also acceptable.&quot; -
http://wiki.answers.com/Q/Is_the_saying_%27all_intents_and_purposes%27_or_%27all_intense_purposes%27

great blog Henry, keep up the good work...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I correct because I love (you)&#8230;<br />
&#8220;Synecdoche, New York is for all intensive purposes,&#8221;</p>
<p>it&#8217;s actually, &#8220;all intents and purposes&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;The correct phrase is &#8220;to all intents and purposes.&#8221; This phrase dates back to the 1500s and originated in English law, where it was &#8220;to all intents, constructions, and purposes.&#8221; In modern usage, &#8220;for all intents and purposes&#8221; is also acceptable.&#8221; -<br />
<a href="http://wiki.answers.com/Q/Is_the_saying_%27all_intents_and_purposes%27_or_%27all_intense_purposes%27" rel="nofollow">http://wiki.answers.com/Q/Is_the_saying_%27all_intents_and_purposes%27_or_%27all_intense_purposes%27</a></p>
<p>great blog Henry, keep up the good work&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

